The Supreme Court of Panama has declared unconstitutional the concession agreements under which a subsidiary of the Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison group managed the ports of Balboa and Cristobal, strategic hubs at the entrances to the Panama Canal.
The court found that the terms of the contracts granted the operator excessive privileges, violated the principles of competition, and failed to comply with constitutional requirements for transparency and state control over critical infrastructure.
What does this mean?
π The legal basis for managing the ports has been declared invalid.
π A major sale of CK Hutchison’s port assets, involving international investors including BlackRock and MSC, is in jeopardy.
π The port operator has announced its intention to challenge the decision in international arbitration.
Panama’s position
The government stated that port operations will continue without interruption, and a new international tender may be held in the future. Authorities also emphasized that control over the ports should not be concentrated in the hands of a single operator.
The decision has sparked international outcry and is seen as a signal of the strengthening of the role of states in controlling strategic port infrastructure, which could impact the investment climate and global supply chains.
π Panama is reviewing its approach to managing key ports, and the situation surrounding the Panama Canal is acquiring not only legal but also geopolitical significance.
π Submit a news item
Seamen’s Club πΊπ¦ | #news